American Institute of Philanthropy  
Not Necessarily Charitable Toward Charities

Major Charities

American Red Cross

Food For The Poor

World Vision


Brother's Brother Foundation

American Cancer Society

Volunteers of America

Mayo Clinic

The Nature Conservancy

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital






Welcome to this American Institute of Philanthropy website. This domain name is for sale. Parties interested in acquiring at a pre-auction price of $5,000 should promptly contact:

to our information and botox web site. Browse our Popular Searches options at left to find deals, sites and services you need now. Scroll down for useful products and resources in the world of botox.


The American Institute of Philanthropy, or AIP, is a nationally recognized group that functions as a watchdog of charitable institutions. Its service purports to interested prospective donors with published information relative to a charity’s honesty, efficiency and integrity -- all in the hope of allowing them to make informed charitable decisions.

The AIP facilitates this by rating charitable organizations after first assessing (among other factors) the percentage of expenses they spend on programs relative to that which goes into fund-raising and executive compensation. In this way, the degree to which a charity is truly dedicated to the well-being of others rather than (as has sometimes sadly been the case) to its own enrichment can be determined. While other organizations, such as GiveWell, Charity Navigator, and GuideStar perform a generally equivalent function, the AIP’s system for the evaluation of charities is considered the most stringent in the industry.


But Who Watches the Watchers?

According to IRS records, in 2008 the AIP spent most of its $485,000 outlay on salaries – this amount intended to cover the evaluation of only 500 charities relative to the more than 5,400 assessed by competitor Charity Navigator. Furthermore the AIP has been charged by more than one charity receiving of its low rating that it fails to use Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a practice that robs them of ratings that would otherwise be outstanding, according to their own lights. Citing favorable ratings from other sources of charity information, these charities also claim that the AIP doesn't properly take the quality of their programs into account.

Another criticism of AIP involves the charge of an overwhelming liberal bias. Thus, the organization is said (in part by the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund, among others) to freely rate large numbers of leftist groups for prospective donors, while keeping ratings of conservative – and particularly pro-military – charities to a minimum. Another group receiving what it regards as unfair criticism by the AIP has been the Paralyzed Veterans of America.

These criticisms and others cited by a study reported in the Stanford Social Innovation Review -- an award-winning magazine covering successful strategies of non-profits, foundations and "socially-responsible" businesses -- found that the AIP performed its evaluations in a way that lacked transparency while nonetheless retaining a corrosive "gotcha" mentality. The report concluded with the statement that "as donors make important decisions using potentially misleading data and analyses, the potential of watchdog agencies to do harm may outweigh their ability to inform."

Thanks for visiting our on-line directory resource site for the American Institute of Philanthropy. Be sure to check out the useful Related Search options at top left featuring categories relevant to your quest. The More Info tab takes you to additional American Institute of Philanthropy resources.
(c), 2008